Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
I left my weave poles where they were and created a nice distraction to capture careless handling. š
He read 1-2-3 right off the bat and made a beautiful jumping effort on #1 every time.
After the initial run with weaves, I gave it some more thought and decided that I could get to 5 for a FC/BC. Still not the turn I wanted.
There was some bad-dog behavior around the toy, so I put it in the middle and then I put it at #4. That was a good reminder to leave the toys until allowed.
At the end of the session, I still donāt have a nice turn at #5, so advice there is welcome. At the very end, I did a zoom on that turn. I am thinking the issue might be training, not handling. He isnāt reading all those collection cues as true collection. I could put him in a sit, put the toy on the exit line and work it like that. Agree?
Thanks,
BarbBarb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
It was a REALLY good thing you sent the CRCD ā I would never have built it so big!
Here is the first part of week 2 longer sequences. I had a lot of happiness with Enzo on these; his response to the verbals was lovely, especially his clear understanding of the difference between ācheckā (wrap left) and āleftā (turn left).
Barb
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Stacy,
Great review ā thanks!
Regarding not going backwards ā apparently that is an issue I really need to work on. It came up in the Zoom and again here. When I look at the video, especially the FC, I want to scream āStop bending over!ā.
Thanks for the hints about training the lap turn. My Belgians just didnāt have this much trouble with it.
Iām not in full agreement with the wideness of the turns at 1:40 and 1:55. Any tighter and the wing would be down. (??) Now, a better exit from the tunnel would be very helpful.
I can certainly do the blinds sooner on the last sequence.
Thanks! I hope to be able to work on the longer sequences on Thursday. š Maybe you could just put the CRCD code for that in your reply. <grin>
Thanks,
BarbBarb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
I couldnāt find a āmaximum minutes of videoā guidance so I just sent all that I would if there werenāt any. This is the week 2 short sequences
Set up 1: Front Cross
For the first rep, I used the in-your-face connection and got a nice turn. Then I tried it with less and got a wider turn. For rep 3 I went back to the stronger connection for a lovely turn.Set up 2: Lap Turn
As I said, I had to teach it. I still donāt like that he wonāt come in close to me and turn more tightly ā advice welcome.Set up 3: Slice
Well, this is exactly what he wouldnāt do on the lap turn ā it was easy. š I did include a lap turn to make sure we were straight on the difference.Set up 4: Blind/wrap
I thought this one went well; did 2 reps.Thanks,
Barbps: PLEASE include CRCD codes for your courses. š
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantWOW, just WOW! The seminar by ZOOM was amazing! I had no idea it would work so well. Actually, I had no idea what it would be like but I didn’t expect it to work that well. It was amazing. And — you are wise to keep it to 4 hours. By the end my head was ready to explode and Enzo was snoring! š
Congrats!!
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
We are off restriction!
I didnāt get video but I did work on the jump before tunnel exercise. Iāve had dogs who really struggled with this but Enzo isnāt one. With jumps at 20ā I moved it forward from 15 feet to 10 feet and he never came close to dropping the bar. And we were going FAST. I didnāt go any closer because
(1) I think 10 feet is plenty close enough and
(2) I hate ātesting to destructionā.Thanks,
BarbBarb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
Well, a million thanks for your noticing eye: yes, Enzo is sore. The Chiropractor only found him āoutā in his front left but he was sore all along his lumbar back. I probably caused this by overworking collection drills; (Iād really like to have one dog in my life who actually knows how to collect when asked).
So, weāre on āno jumpingā through Sunday but swimming is ok, so weāll do that.
Thanks!
BarbBarb VanEseltine
ParticipantThanks — agree. Barb
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
What I think is: āWow, I really hope Tracy is right!ā
I donāt have a massage appointment soon but I am seeing the chiropractor tomorrow (normal monthly session). I think sheāll be able to advise if she thinks he is sore. I do know a masseuse, so I can get him an appointment if I need to.
I suppose he might be sore but Iām not at all clear on why. We have been doing some foundation contact work but Iām not sure why that would make him sore. Otherwise, I havenāt seen any particular thing. Although, of course, running and ripping around the yard with the other dogs always has accident potential. I didnāt see anything but I could easily miss it.
On the A-frame suggestions, I have a beeper mat which I bought for Lollieās running DW. I didnāt really need it but itās around somewhere. At the current moment, Jen Pinder and I are working on ground work with lead changes. That seems to be a big deal for him (Jen calls Lollie a ālead change savantā to explain why she never needed any special lead-change work).
So, Iāll give him some time off and see what my Chiro says.
Thanks!
Barb-
This reply was modified 5 years, 7 months ago by
Barb VanEseltine.
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantFunny — it turned on the italics and didn’t turn it off. š
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
As far as new things ā well, thatās part of what makes it fun. Moving on to the courseworkā¦
I set up the Masters Course and I think he was over faced. At any rate, it was a serious goat rodeo. Iām putting up a video showing what happened and I mostly want a quick piece of advice:
Should I just renumber for course #2 or should I build and work on the Novice courses?
Throughout most of camp, I have felt that the masterās level work was good for him: pushing and difficult but not so hard as to be discouraging. This morning, I think it was too much.
PLEASE keep in mind that the contacts are still a work in progress. Iām not really worried about them (yet). Although, because I was watching the running A-frame I was late on the next line. And all of his A-frames were awful.
When I first saw this course, I thought that the two interesting parts would be
⢠#3: should I do the forced front or the German?
⢠#10 to #14: could I get far enough aheadI have no idea why so many bars went down. I wasnāt able to get far enough ahead on 10 to 14 because I was watching the truly awful A-frame performances. <sigh> I thought about a spin on #9 but didnāt want to take the time.
So maybe the best thing to do is to glance at this and suggest I go do the novice work. Which would be fine.
Thanks,
Barb
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
It seemed to me to be very nice ā Iām glad you agree!
Yes, I think he needs some distraction work ā arm flings and words. We had quite a mess on todayās course work and that might have been part of it. I will definitely do some proofing work on that.
Thanks,
BarbBarb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
Running a bit late on the Friday zigzag but finally got it done. I remembered to include some reading, also.
Thanks,
BarbBarb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
Hmmm. Here are my thoughts tonight (going to try it again tomorrow). Iām following everything up until we get to sequence 2. When you say, āconverge more on 3ā do you mean āgo in further between 3 and 4ā? I was trying hard NOT to do that and get stuck by 4 and unable to get to 5. Later on you say, āconverge more immediatelyā which maybe means ācut in after 3 sooner so you can get out and on your way to 5ā. I am more excited by your suggestion to try to do it with lateral distance, since I canāt get stuck by #4 if that works.
Well, so I gave it a try. First, apparently today was my day for expecting my verbal cues to completely override my positional cues. <sigh> I made the same mistake a number of times, perhaps it will stick. Or you could say: I wasnāt successful using lateral distance. After the errors, there were two successful runs. In both cases, I was trying to cut in more quickly after 3 to set the #4 backside as a straight(er) line. Is that what you were talking about?
Repeat of sequence 2: https://youtu.be/5HWTHwuogJI
Then on to sequence 3. Here it is twice through; the first time with a backside mistake and the second time clean. See what you thinkā¦
Sequence 3 video: https://youtu.be/sPF_Yi-4JV8
Thanks,
BarbAlso: I really appreciate that you can tell me things without making me feel like a lousy trainer with a poorly trained dog. That is a skill which some people, even though they are excellent handlers and instruct a lot, have not mastered. I realize that with my age and experience I should be able to shrug it off, but I canāt and I donāt. If we were talking obedience, back in the day, then I would be much more confident and steadfast. But agility is a constantly changing game and if someone tells me that Iām not doing it right, I am likely to believe them. Also, the COVID19 thing is making everyone more sensitive. I think Dudley had it right when she said everyone should strive to be extra nice. You are always extra nice and I really appreciate it.
Barb VanEseltine
ParticipantHi Tracy,
We had a little bit of nice weather ā occasional rain and temperatures in the seventies. But now weāre back to high eighties and Enzo has had enough of that (me too). So I brought him inside for the sequences since they fit in the barn (which has a/c). In past summers, I have almost never used the barn. It has been cool enough to train outside almost all the time. This year, the barn has been a godsend.
When it comes time to do the courses, weāll have to be outside but I figure thereās no real hurry.
First up, the skills. They went fine.
Next is the Masters Sequences. I got the first two done today.
The first sequence was the biggest surprise. I timed them from āhead over jump 1ā to ānose exit from tunnelā. I did it twice.
First run, wrapped #2 to the inside and #4 to the inside. That is the dog path I would have chosen. Time: 16.5.
As a lark, I did another run wrapping 2 and 4 to the outside. I thought the wraps were more rotation (especially #2) although I did notice that the tunnel entrances were better. My guess was the time would be slightly longer or about the same. ***SHOCK*** I was more than one second faster. Live and learn; I didnāt think the smoothness of the tunnel entrance was that important.The second sequence did not, it seemed to me, have much in the way of dog path choices. As and exercise, I worked 5 and a slice and a wrap. I did the wrap using two different handling choices. The wrap was never going to be faster, since (a) it was a wrap and (b) the tunnel entrance was worse. But it wasnāt as bad as I thought. First run 13.4; second run (wrapped around me) 14.2 and third run 13.9; measuring from nose over jump 1 to nose over the last jump.
Hopefully more tomorrow.
Thanks!
Barb -
This reply was modified 5 years, 7 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts